Monday, 10 December 2012

Book Review - Our Frugal Future, NESTA UK, 2012

That ‘something’ about India

Book Review: Our Frugal Future: Lessons from India’s Innovation System
NESTA, July 2012, pp.94, Downloadable from: www.nesta.org.uk

Western governments have always been intrigued by India, and with the global anticipation of further economic crisis and opportunity, are not less so now. Everything that is asserted about India is also provable in its direct opposite, therefore unravelling the mystery of India is never a finished effort. NESTA's research (NESTA is a London-based think tank) publication "Our Frugal Future: Lessons from India's Innovation System" is a follow-up on an excellent earlier exploration titled India: The Uneven Innovator (2007), in which the authors made the case against a simplistic or keyhole view of science & innovation in India. Both these studies are sponsored by the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO), and we should expect more pathfinder studies to follow.
The authors say that institutional efforts towards innovation, especially government-sponsored efforts, although on the increase, remain inadequate; however, Indian innovation should also be measured by non-traditional metrics. They identify 'frugal innovation' as the key feature of the Indian innovation paradigm. Frugal innovation is being pursued in all sectors -- private, government and unorganised.
Frugal innovation is characterised by the search for fit for purpose, fit for purse solutions. 'Frugal' is a mind-set and can be applied in any setting - high tech or 'bullock-cart'. 'Jugaad' has been widely discussed as the precursor to 'frugal innovation'; as we all know it is the response of the underdog to high-price-tag innovation. It is the smart response of the less rich, who seek to achieve similar outcomes at a lower cost and minus the inessential frills. It is a survival mechanism in a highly competitive & cost-conscious environment where textbook procedures may be cumbersome and obstructive and need to be bent or reinvented and the players cannot wait for the administration to get its act together. At the end of the day, it is about being bold and entrepreneurial; it is about getting ‘more and more for less and less, for more and more people’. The 'Frugal' mentality in India is aided by a national culture of conservation, avoidance of waste and reverence for the environment.
The authors refer to more respectable intellectual traditions -- citing the influence of Schumacher's Small is Beautiful (1962), through Toyota's lean management (1980's), to Prahalad's Bottom of the Pyramid (2002). Frugal innovation is also seen as a notch above jugaad, a bolder and more assured approach towards problem-solving, less driven by constraints than by values.
In particular, the authors observe that the 'jugaad culture' is supported by the business ecosystem - the entrepreneurs, consumers and financial institutions in India. They ask -- could this approach be the silver bullet for a global economy characterised by shortages in the face of explosive demand? How can jugaad be scaled up, its principles leveraged on a global scale? If you have an idea on this -- there are folks in the UK FCO's innovation group who will be interested!
The authors note that frugal innovation is not only about products but also about business models and services. They cite well-known examples of low-cost heart surgeries and artificial limbs and less-known instances for example of community-supported geriatric care. Note however that these home-grown business models are built on market pull, delivering a product or service demanded by the market, versus pushing a completely new product onto the market. The authors do not analyse from this standpoint, although it would be interesting to know if this is a key differentiator of innovation -- as it is understood and pursued in India. Another interesting dichotomy is the use of 'frugal' as a defining characteristic of R&D policy in India, versus 'plentiful' as the defining R&D goal in the West. A vital difference in perspective?
The authors refer to the growing use of Indian technical knowledge workers via the setting up of global R&D centres by MNCs in India. Although this talent has become a ‘have to have’ for MNCs, the authors observe that it is not clear yet how these R&D centres impact innovation in India. However the authors do not analyse what potential impact these centres might have going forward as these skilled technology workers start migrating out of these high-tech centres and perhaps setting up their own.
The authors find that although Indian research publications have doubled over a decade, most of those publications are 'of below average quality'. 62% of the R&D spend is in defence, atomic energy and space research – from which documented examples of frugal innovation are not known. In contrast, pharma, an area abounding with examples, accounts for only 2%. Thus, non-formal, ground-up and enterprise-driven innovation system seems to score above the formal R&D system! Organised & self-conscious pursuit of frugal innovation in big industry and big science in India seems still to be limited to a handful of enterprising leaders.
The study provides a wealth of data on institutions, geographies and international collaboration, and interesting analytical appendices. Noteworthy is the bibliography of 324 referenced publications and the 150-odd named individuals from whom anecdotal data and opinions were sourced.
There is a race for strategic collaboration with India in innovation. There is also a race among investors peeling their eyes for the next black swan or golden goose. The study holds up the mirror to the innovation community in India and tells us something about what those in the race are looking for.
Published in Business Standard

Body & ID: Life of Pi Movie Review

Film Review: Life of Pi 

In November, on the sidelines of the New York Film Festival, Tom Rothman, Chairman of Fox Studios said brightly to an interviewer in response to a question on the risks of spending a large budget on a film 'like this one', "Believe me, people are going to be eating a lot of popcorn watching this movie!". It sounded very unlikely at the time and smacked of marketing hype. Well, it turned out Tom Rothman knew what he was talking about. Life of Pi, made with a reported budget of $120 million has made gross earnings of over $166 million (10 Dec) since its release on 21 November, with many screens still screening it in its 4th week, and with many markets yet to start screening. In India and China, the film is a blockbuster, competing head to head with powerful local and Western productions for the audience's attention and money.

Earlier on, in September, Director Ang Lee said in a press interview: "I want this to be a film that people go to with their families and talk about for many days after they have seen it." Today, people all over the world are queuing up to see it a second time, sometimes a third. In India, kids are dragging parents to the cinema. (On right is 'home-work' on the movie by one 6-year old from India who 'took' her parents to see the film.)

If you haven't read the book, you'll probably miss the twist in the tale at the end of the film. From the folks I spoke to, I figured that most had. Only those who had read the book to its end really knew what was going on in the movie. It was not just an adventure story about getting lost in a boat along with a tiger, although that was a fine story to tell anyway. The people who took it to be only that however would have found the final monologue of Pi exasperatingly slow, and incomprehensible.

To really appreciate Life of Pi (the movie) one has to see it backwards, starting at the end.

The story is really about a power struggle between the 'human' and 'animal' side of the teenage Pi, as he struggles to survive in the middle of the ocean with almost nothing to keep body and soul together. To avoid a spoiler, I refrain from expanding further.

"O Avatar of Vishnu, in the forests of my mind are the wild animals of Ego and Violence. Help me O Lord of the Spirits, to quell these wild animals and dwell upon You!" -- thus goes a Sanskrit chant that is common in India. Hunger is not mentioned as engendering these wild animals that haunt the mind, yet it is the same prayer that Pi sends up to the gods when he calls upon them in the middle of the "Storm of God" sequence in the movie.

The tiger shoots into into the boat-life at a momentous point, when Pi, fed up, disgusted and infuriated with the hyena's wanton behaviour and ruthlessness, taunts and challenges it to fight with him. The wild side of the boy shoots into the picture, playing the hyena's own game against it, and thereby becoming like the hyena, albeit in a nobler external form.

The rest of the movie is about the split personality of Pi - the spiritual side versus the animal side. It is the animal side that keeps the body alive. It is the spiritual side that keeps the soul alive. Pi the boy recognises his two aspects. He prays to the gods to keep him sane, to protect him from himself. He prays for grace, but not for food or rescue. He prays to save himself, literally for his soul or spiritual aspect. He does not want his being to be 'swallowed up' by the tiger. Nor can he kill the tiger. It is next to impossible. He must find a way to bring the tiger under control, to live with it, recognising interdependence. The animal, however dreadful, is a part of us, but ah, let it not be the whole of us.

The genius of the movie is that the entire film when viewed backwards makes perfect sense, stands together solidly.

Now you know why Pi, in relating his 'other' story, speaks with disgust, venom towards the events that 'brought out the worst in me', instead of with sadness about having lost his family. He tells the story of how his personality split into two distinct poles. The story is about the dynamic relationship between the two poles. The tiger does not exist without Pi the person, and Pi the human cannot exist any more without the tiger. Without the tiger, Pi would die of plain starvation. Without Pi the boy, the tiger is just an animal, there is no human left to tell a story.

The power struggle is demonstrated in the many episodes: Pi's shock at discovering the tiger, the tiger swimming towards Pi on the raft, the training of the tiger,the images in the water, the competition for food, the shared gait and increasingly similar demeanour, the joint journey towards imminent death.

Retrospectively, I find the poster of Life of Pi, in which Pi is shown standing on the boat, with the tiger occupying the other end, as rich and powerful in metaphor. The poster shows the balance of power in the boat, with both sides demonstrating territory and jurisdiction. Body and soul.

Go watch Life of Pi. Watch it a second time. Back to front.